Open bidding for construction projects should be easy. A company submits the lowest bid, it is automatically awarded the construction agreement for the public project, right? But municipal and federal contracts are routinely the subject of bid protests by aggrieved bidders.
In most jurisdictions, the lowest responsible bidder is the party awarded the contract. Responsible bidder is one of those great legal catch all (mush?) words such as reasonable, or fair. These sorts of words drive non-lawyers crazy because everyone understands their own sense of what is reasonable, but never seem to understand why someone else seems to have a different standard. But that is what
judges are for, and attorneys to advocate their own clients’ version of reasonable. It also leads to cases about what a reasonable dog would do.
In
While a public entity does not have free reign to define its own reasonable dog standard, courts often defer to the discretion of public officials. Exceptions exist where one can show fraud, corruption, unfair dealing or favoritism, gross injustice, illegality, palpable abuse of discretion, or arbitrary, capricious action. If you suspect one of these scenarios in your public bid, contact an attorney to discuss how best to prove it. If you can’t prove it, your protest will be all bark and no bite.
Would you like to have your construction contract reviewed for free? Send us your contract here.









Comments